With the aim simply to provide information, as in fact (this is a case which has already been exami

We have already referred to the leader newspapers published sensational news - ostensibly experts drew the conclusion resonance pedophilia case, even without having seen the girls - denied by the State Division of Forensic Psychiatry Constantine Daškevičius (see publication "Daily newspaper published a leading arc lamp sensation of the State Forensic Psychiatry Service Manager call bullshit).
How this misinformation leading newspapers claim the court psychiatrist and expert Vida Kilikevičienė itself participated in the examination. Yesterday, personal website, it described his interaction with reporters, explained what happened during the examination and gave Arkady Vinokur comment, which further spread the same dailies leader "duck." We offer a minimum (only linguistically) adjusted V. Kilikevičienės text.
Today, I communicated with the Lithuanian Rytas TV journalist Ruth Pauliukonyte. I agreed because I wanted to respond to the media yesterday at the online portal as well as through LNK display knowledge arc lamp disseminated "duck", the so-called pedophilia case, the experts concluded that, even without having arc lamp seen the girls.
With the aim simply to provide information, as in fact (this is a case which has already been examined in public hearings, was available for anyone wanting to take part, examined in several courts). However, arc lamp speaking to this journalist at the time, I felt uncomfortable from the questions and still brought closer luminous tube (lamp) - getting closer and closer to my face, as a kind of criminals. The reporter began to ask many times and listened to a (then once again back with, and even listened to) whether or not the experts saw the girl expertise. When I confirmed that it is really seen, the examination was the same as all the other kids, and then the reporter has to ask if I myself took part in expertise. I confirmed, and this reporter has asked the question, "Whether I'm with her (girl) talked?". Later, she inserted "but the hearing examiner stated that the girls did not see." Then I tried to figure out and explain to the examiner, which did not see the girls were specialist professionals conducting the investigation arc lamp - this is nebebuvusi expertise, is a former professional study object arc lamp investigation were other things: girls polls, arc lamp surveys, consultations, arc lamp including the examination of by myself in participated. It was a professional study, and experts arc lamp who participated in this study served as specialists in office and had to assess all the material submitted. Did not anticipate that this study has for the girl - she has previously attended, as I said, polls, expert opinion.
Then I asked a journalist - why nesikreipėte particular experts (forensic psychiatry service) and refused, or had a girl in expertise or not, but as soon as paskleidėte a rumor? Reporter just paused. arc lamp And then promptly continued uždavinėjo me questions: arc lamp "How much did took the examination?". I tried to explain the practice arc lamp of the examination lasts as long as necessary, as far as questions, uncertainties, both as an expert takes time to understand arc lamp the situation, the person's state of the current situation, as well as research and answer the following questions (you need not to remember that an expert in the study material are already aware of the pre-and post-trial interview with a person under a certain period of time to further analyze the material under investigation and the status of the person). However, all this young journalist did not care, she pushed me in every way that I would name just off the nearest minute, how is it lasted. Now it would be difficult, and because of this expertise is passed 4 years. After our department experts have studied about a thousand children. Why is no interest in the other children?
Again was embarrassed to hear from the lips of fellow journalist child psychiatrist Lino Slušný name - he was like the best knows how the child psychiatrist expert should work. According to the journalist, "Slušnys say that you need a lot of time with the child to make contact." Nothing on this common ground. arc lamp But he is an expert does not work, so even do not know how we are the contact arc lamp by the level of the contact with the child is reached, and so on. (At least never to hearing). The contact, a good relationship with the child, we really forging. Furthermore, no study would not be possible, not just expertise. Many children go to calm down after the examinations and easier sighed, but our journalists arc lamp such topics touching. Relief is often unsafe, support, and support nesulaukiantiems children and those children whose decisions are strongly influenced by adult dictated opinion. These children should not have to continue treatment with the court children and adolescents psychiatrists experts, and with children and adolescent psychiatrist.
Just after the stuck case of children and adolescents in forensic psychiatry section are performed close to a thousand different expertise to other children, minors. There is no other such a stuck case.